<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gard &#38; Bond, L.L.C. &#187; Robert Corry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medicalmarijuanalawcolorado.com/tag/robert-corry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medicalmarijuanalawcolorado.com</link>
	<description>Colorado Medical Marijuana Legal Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:58:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Court of Appeals guts MMJ Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.medicalmarijuanalawcolorado.com/medical-marijuana-colorado/court-of-appeals-guts-mmj-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medicalmarijuanalawcolorado.com/medical-marijuana-colorado/court-of-appeals-guts-mmj-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Gard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caregiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clendenin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary caregiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Corry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medicalmarijuanalawcolorado.com/medical-marijuana-colorado/court-of-appeals-guts-mmj-amendment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the Colorado Court of Appeals announced its decision in the case of People v. Clendenin, a case handled by attorney Robert Corry.  The case dealt a serious blow to patients rights and casts doubt on whether a primary caregiver will receive any legal protection.  The case can be read at: http://www.cobar.org/opinions/opinion.cfm?opinionid=7372&#038;courtid=1.
It is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the Colorado Court of Appeals announced its decision in the case of People v. Clendenin, a case handled by attorney Robert Corry.  The case dealt a serious blow to patients rights and casts doubt on whether a primary caregiver will receive any legal protection.  The case can be read at: http://www.cobar.org/opinions/opinion.cfm?opinionid=7372&#038;courtid=1.</p>
<p>It is more critical than ever to view the MMJ laws as conservatively as possible.  Under the Clendenin case, the Court of Appeals ruled that the primary care-giver affirmative defense does not apply where the provision of marijuana is itself the substance of the relationship.  As I have told prosective caregivers who seek my advice, caregiving means more than cultivating and/or providing MMJ to your patient and any such activities must be limited only to patients who have assigned you to be their caregiver (i.e., no walk-in business!).  Caregiving requires a personal relationship and providing MMJ to your patient is only one small part of managing the patient&#8217;s well-being.  In order to receive any protection a caregiver must (1) have a personal relationship with the patient; (2) be assigned the right to cultivate and provide MMJ by and on behalf of the patient; and (3) MMJ must only be a small part of your caregiving service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medicalmarijuanalawcolorado.com/medical-marijuana-colorado/court-of-appeals-guts-mmj-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

